![]() ![]() Internal consistency of the alternate versions was measured by the Cronbach's α.ģ0 controls (age 73.4 years, 60% female) and 30 patients (age 75.4 years, 73% female) with Mild NCD were recruited. One-month test-retest and inter-rater reliability were examined in 20 participants. Criterion validity of the two alternate versions in differentiating patients with Mild NCD was tested using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The objective of this study is to develop two alternate versions of the MoCA (Hong Kong version HK-MoCA) and to investigate the validity and reliability of the alternate versions in patients with DSM-5 Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (Mild NCD) and cognitively healthy controls.Ĭoncurrent validity and inter-scale agreement were examined by Pearson correlation of the total scores between the original and alternate versions and the Bland-Altman Method. Repeated testing using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) increases risks for practice effects which may bias measurements of cognitive change. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |